mario garcia. okay, the man may be a money 'mint'ing machine (guess you got the quote-unquote connection) but he still seems to make his point every time i read him. except, of course, in his by-now-predictable huge page one piece on a paper he has redesigned.
here's one that i must have read a hajaar times. but still appeals. reason: it tells you how our over-paid designers in print media (and trust me, most of them are HUGELY OVERPAID without knowing their first column from their grid line) take us journalists for a ride.
* write a good headline, rich ol' mario says, DO NOT care how they are placed.
* break, or do not break till eternity joins you for breakfast, yuour text flow
* move your necessary nonsense (quick takes and stuff) from first column to the last, or from top to the bottom of the page,without worrying about your ma-in-law (i don;t have one, but the old foggeys in the paper always come across as one)
anyway, here we go. a 10-year-old piece that still seems to hold good// from the poynter website, of course (it just landed from an old newspaper colleague on mailbox, so refreshened memories):
10 Universal Newspaper Design Myths, Debunked
By Mario Garcia, The Poynter Institute
My diary entries contain travelogues, agendas, and occasionally, the graffiti of design myths. I always write these myths in red, to make sure I do not forget them. I must have more than 150 that I have listed during 20 years of traveling, but there are 10 that have become the "Super Myths," those that transcend nationalities, ethnicity, or language. I offer them as a checklist to see how many of them are part of your own myth repertoire:
1. Don't run headlines next to each other.
"Bumping headlines" should be ranked as the No. 1 design myth, especially in the United States. I am certain that more time is spent in newsrooms everywhere designing pages that avoid headlines coming together than actually writing better headlines.
As a veteran of hundreds of focus groups that were shown pages with headlines that sometimes bumped, I have yet to hear a reader anywhere echo the complaint about "bumping headlines."
Of course, I am not an advocate of bumped headlines. However, I am suggesting that we should not spend unnecessary time and effort avoiding what seems to affect no one but the editor and his old journalism school professor.
2. Readers don't like reversed out type.
Well, many editors don't. And I am sure that readers would probably find it unusual and hard to read if an entire article were set in white type against a black or color background. However, a few lines of a quote or a highlight set against a dark background will not affect legibility as long as the type size is larger than normal and the interline spacing is adequate.
3. Color must be introduced slowly.
Life is in color. Attempts at a slow introduction of color in a newspaper that may have been entirely black and white for years are quite exaggerated. In this regard, one must respect the editors' knowledge of their own communities and their readers' ability to assimilate change.
However, my own experience has been that color is almost always extremely well received, and that readers in most communities no longer attach the label of "less serious" to newspapers that print in color. Specifically with 25- to 35-year-old readers, color is an expectation more than an abomination.
What is important, and this must be emphasized, is that color use be appropriate for the newspaper and its community.
4. Italics are difficult to read.
I have heard this more than 500 times, from South America to South Africa, and in Malaysia, too! Every editor seems to have a built-in catalog of anecdotes to illustrate why italics should never be used. They are supposed to be "feminine"; therefore, why use them in the macho sports section? They are "strange" to the reader and imply soft news, as opposed to hard news, so relegate them to the gardening page. And, last, italics slow down the reading, so avoid them in text.
The truth? Italics are unisex. A feature in sports can wear italics well, but so can that souffle story in the food section. The soft-versus-hard implication is an American phenomenon, I must admit. A banner headline in a strong italic font played large will be able to do the job as well as a Roman headline. Size and boldness and the distinction of the type used are more significant than whether the type is italic.
Contrast italics with Roman type, or bolder or lighter type nearby, and they make that souffle rise on the page. Add them as a secondary line under a classic Roman face, and there is music on the page. Give the name on the byline an italic touch, and somehow the visual rhythm of the text may be altered for the better.
5. Don't mix color and black-and-white photos or graphics on the same page.
Never once have I heard a reader complain about this special cocktail of mixed black-and-white and color images. The designer's task is to select the best possible images, regardless of color, and display them properly on the page following a hierarchy that indicates where the eye should go first, second, and third. The color versus black-and-white issue becomes quite secondary to the content of the images, their placement on the page, and the role of the images in the overall design.
6. Don't interrupt the flow of text.
Magazines have been using quotes, highlights, and other text breakers for years. However, place one of these devices in the text of many newspapers and you will find a chorus of editors repeating the same verse: Any interruption of text causes the reader to stop reading.
I have found no evidence of this in the many focus groups I have observed or in The Poynter Institute's own EYE-TRAC Research. (EYE-TRAC scientifically documented how color, text, graphics, and photos direct a reader's eyes around a newspaper page.) Of course, interruptions can become obstacle courses if:
- One places a 24-line quote across 12 picas, forcing the reader to jump over text; or
- One places the breaker in such a strategic position that the reader will not jump over it, but assumes instead that he should move across to the adjacent column.
So length of the interruption and its placement determine legibility factors. Any interruption that requires more than a 2-1/2 inch jump should be reconsidered.
7. Readers prefer justified type over ragged-right type.
The myth is that ragged-right type implies "soft" or feature material, while justified type represents serious hard news. This, too, is only in the minds of editors and some designers. There is no evidence of the truth to this perception. If newspapers had always set all their text ragged right, readers would have accepted that style.
Ragged-right type can change the rhythm on the page, even when used for short texts or for columnists. Its use incorporates white space, which is always needed, and allows for more appropriate letter spacing within and between words. Some research has confirmed that the presence of ragged right speeds up reading.
8. Story count counts.
One must have, says this myth, a minimum of five stories on the front page. Well, it is seven in some newspapers, and 11 in others. Story count is a state of mind; it should not be a formula. No two days in the news are alike for the editor putting together Page One. On certain days, one big story may equal four, or even seven, small ones. Sometimes a photo may carry the weight of 10 stories, and so on. Individual elements are what count, not a systematic formula that forces elements to satisfy a quota on the page.
What do we know about story count and Page One?
Well, the front page is still the face of the newspaper and must display not only the day's news but promote the best content inside. More is definitely better than less, and index items, promo boxes, and even standalone photos are all part of what makes the eye move. Readers in focus groups do not count stories.
Eye movement - activity on the canvas of the page - is what counts. How one makes the readers' eyes move can be determined by factors that are not necessarily associated with the mythical story counts that editors are subjected to.
9. Leave things in the same place every day.
For many editors, a Page One or a section front with static elements (promos at the top, left-hand column of briefs, etc.) provides a sort of teddy bear to embrace when they come to work every day. So, in typical fashion, editors always ask for the teddy bears.
There is no truth to the myth that readers want these elements exactly in the same places every day. I prefer to experiment with "teddy bears on roller skates" - let the promo boxes appear differently from day to day. Some days use one promo only, some days use three promos. Surprise the reader with promos that run vertically on Tuesday, but horizontally on Wednesday.
10. The lead story must always appear on the right-hand side of the page.
Editors seem sure of this, but nobody bothered to tell the readers. To them, the lead story is the one with the biggest and boldest headline, whether it is to the right or the left. Of course, hierarchy is important. No myth here. One definitive lead must appear on the page to guide the reader, but its appearance, as long as it is above the fold, becomes inconsequential.
Why the myths?
Well, what would newspapers be without them? Meetings would be shorter, and less argumentative, especially if there was no "italics" myth. Who creates the myths? Like the games children play, nobody knows where these myths start. Children teach each other games in the schoolyard; professors pass on myths to their innocent charges in journalism school. Then those myths gain momentum when the rookie journalist hears the same myth glorified by his veteran editor, and so on.
What can one do about myths? Select the ones you really want to do battle over, then wrestle the myth promoter to the ground.
Sometimes you win.
© 1996, The Poynter Institute for Media Studies. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished without express permission of The Poynter Institute.
Monday, June 25, 2007
Friday, June 22, 2007
Weatherman, get me a hot June with extra roasted skin, please
I don't like it because in three decades of Delhi has been (had been?) different. Bring on the heat, mate. Forty-five or thereabouts (in Celsius). 25 out of 30 days. The other five can jump around the 47-mark or so. It's then, in those five days, that I would hate the middle month of the calendar. I would have a reason to hate it. And I would love that reason, howsoever hateable.
I would love to love it for the other 25 days. For hot is what June is supposed to be.
Is there any reason to associate rain or green with June? That's the tango best left for July and August. Perhaps.
I like heat because it's the best time for people-watching. Angry, hungry, thirsty, frustrated, tired, freaked-out, sweaty, sticky, smelly. Et cetera. Try imagining a face with even half as many expressions in any other season, and I'll quit smoking. Content, happy, smiling. Blah. They are all you get otherwise. Duh. Bring on the heat, any day.
Sunday, June 17, 2007
Brits chuck the tabs, Delhi awaits more
With Todays, Tomorrows and Yesterdays in queue to take on the Metros, Nows, Mirrors and Mid Days of this country, here's news from The Guardian's media site. Sure to give some, ahem, indigestion (stop burping now). I quote, obviously:
UK's daily red-top newspapers continued to see a steady year-on-year drop in sales in May, with circulation dropping by an average of 4%, according to the Audit Bureau of Circulations.
The Sun has seen its circulation fall by 105,000 copies, or 3.36%, in the past 12 months to 3,043,351.
The paper's circulation has fallen 17% since May 2000, down from more than 3.5m. Month-on-month circulation fell 0.14% from 3,047,527 in April.
Daily Mirror also saw its circulation edge upwards from 1,537,143 in April to 1,554,610 last month, an increase of 1.14%. But the Mirror's latest monthly circulation figure is down 4.86% from 1,634,006 in May 2006.
Media's web of torture
Websites, to believe firang papers and fellow websites (primarily the latter, for Subject being a print journalist has little money to buy the former), are the future of media . Future a capital F and all that jazz. But does,seriously, anyone think even once, forget twice, before putting a webpage to bed? Chew a few random samplings:
expressindia.com: "I'll not be a rubber stamp president: Patil
(THAT'S THE POOR WOMAN'S FAULT, NOT THE SITE 'MANAGERS'. HAS ANYONE IN INDEPENDENT REPUBLIC AND WHATEVER OF INDIA EXPECTED A PRESIDENT TO BE ANYTHING OTHER THAN A RUBBER STAMP WHO LIVES IN A 34-ACRE OR WHATEVER ESTATE, GOES ON 15 FOREIGN JAUNTS AND ATTENDS 500 RIBBON-CUTTING OPENING CEREMONIES IN 5 YEARS?)
Anyway, here's the supposed catchline that apparently attempts to draw in a reader:
"Pratibha Patil, whose loyalty to Nehru-Gandhi family was widely perceived to be a major factor in her nomination as Prez candidate, said that she'll have 'own independent thinking'.
(OWN INDEPENDENT THINKING? JUST WONDERING: CAN THINKING BE IN SHARED DOMAIN? )
from indiatimes.com:
"Can a woman be effective as India's President? "
(LONG BEFORE SHARAD PAWAR FORMED NCP AND WHILE I WAS IN COLLEGE, AT A TIME WHEN DINOSAURS USED TO ROAM AROUND ON DELHI'S RING ROAD, THERE WAS A WORD CALLED "MCP"// GUESS SOMEONE OF THAT ILK WROTE THIS HEADLINE//)
Anyway, read on:
"If Patil wins, she will be India's first woman President." (THANKS; JUST THAT THE NEWS IS 48 HOURS TOO LATE. BUT WILL DO.) A historic decision, according to Congress president Sonia Gandhi. (SO, SONIA G IS TELLING US WHAT THE FIRST SENTENCE SAID ANYWAY. WILL DO... PERHAPS.) And a decision that is being lauded by women groups across the country. (WOMEN GROUP? HAVE THEY STOPPED WRITING APOSTROPHEs AND Ss IN GURGAON?)
First three sentences, and kiss your reader goodbye and goodnight. Thanks for the enlightenment, folks.
from mid-day.com:
Anyway, the three para copy (it's an agency copy, but shows just how callous staffers on payroll are) goes:
"
Small, silly mistake, but it pisses a reader enough to check out of the site. We in the newspaper industry give a go-through to each copy before it is flown on page. Can someone please do the same for websites, and make us journos look a little less silly?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)